Meni ne smetaju prequeli, meni smeta rušenje ignoriranje kanona.
Serija Enterprise mi je super.

Ali ovaj novi film nije jer on nije prequel već re-boot, a to su dvije različite stvari.

A zašto Sulua i O'Briena nebi glumili isti glumci.

Jer su stari ko Biblija

Pa Sulu, je bio star kad je postao kapetan. Tako da tu uopće nema problema, šminka i CGI facelifting i sve uredu.

O'Briena bi mogao istina glumiti neki mlađi glumac.

Suluu nebi ni to pomoglo... uz svu onu tehnologiju u 23.st nije izgledao ništa mlađe

Evo dijela recenzije novog filma.
Kako sam i mislila ne samo da je re-boot već nema ni duh star treka.
U filmu je naglasak na efektima i nasilju.



'' What really makes Star Trek 2009 so very sad is its message, namely that far into mankind’s future, a future mankind was not destined to see, the best, most exciting job “out there” was joining the military. Some robo-historians have pondered if Star Trek 2009 was indeed a true product of its time and had more to do with recruitment than ideas. Umm, this was always an issue with the Star Trek franchise, was it not?


So, in the end, the sparkling sets and visual effects cannot escape the fact that Star Trek 2009 is short on story, focusing on Kirk and Spock’s childhood and youth, at the expense of looking into the future of the Star Trek universe. One can only ponder what stories could have been told instead, what social issues could have been addressed. Instead, the core of this backward looking movie was violence, not exploration, revisiting the past, not visiting the future. Interestingly, it seemed that looking into the future was something that had become decidedly un-American during the early Twenty-First Century. In this regard, Star Trek 2009 was a perfect reflection of its time, conservative in thought and afraid of change, afraid of the future. Regressive, corporate and cowardly.


''Story (Adjusted to Accommodate Human Standards) C (Perfunctory exploration of all too familiar character so as to avoid looking to the future. A cowardly script. If one peels away the layers of visuals effects, the spaceship battles, the modernized sets and laser beams, what is left? More of the same that the audience had been seeing for decades, and on must wonder, how did this pass with the fanbase?)


Acting (Adjusted to Accommodate Human Standards) B


Human Portrayal of machines and Robots A
Enjoyability Grade (Adjusted to Accommodate Human Standards) C (As Star Trek had been “broken” for a very, very long time, it was no real surprise that Star Trek 2009 disappointed.)


Primitive Home Theater/HD Factor A (Overall a beautiful work.)

Overall Innovation (Adjusted to Accommodate Human Standards) D (How could there be anything innovative here? No matter how good of a script was generated, it would never be appropriate, as Star Trek 2009 needed to explore the future not just re-hash the safe, bankable past of its Kirk years.)''

Rai'Tara, ja ti se stvarno divim koliko ti trošiš vremena na čitanje recenzija, intervjua, vijesti i svega toga za film koji te uopće ne zanima.

Evo, mene zanima film i gledat ću ga sigurno, pa vijesti onako pratim jednim okom (uglavnom da si ne spoilam nešto puno), ove recenzije ni ne mislim čitati...

Ovo je recenzija i nema veze sa predrasudama. On je gledao film i razočarao se je u njemu.

Toliko o tvom kanoniziranju.

Ja ipak mislim da ga je mrzio davno prije nego ga je gledao.

To nisu uopće recenzije, već jedva da se radi o nekoliko rečenica. Ja sam dala pravu recenziju opsežnu, od osobe koja nije plaćena da promovira film.

Isto tako oni koji su gledali film kažu da se uopće ne spominje da obje timeline postoje istovremeno. Već da je samo timeline promjenjen i to je to. A neke promjene su užasne.
Poput plavog neba na Vulkanu. Odnosno promjenili su glavnu stvar po kojoj se taj planet razlikuje od zemlje.
U svim serijama i filmovima, Vulkan je imao narančasto-crvenkasto nebo.

Tako da su fanovi koji su gledali film jako razočarani, zvjezdana flota pretvorena je u vojsku, od istraživanja ništa.

To su samo zadnji, zaključni odlomci iz kompletnih recenzija.


Nisi ni navela autora te recenzije.


I to je bilo prilično glupo. Plava boja neba je rezultat loma svjetlosti kroz slojeve atmosfere.

Ako Vulkan ima atmosferu poput Zemljine (klasa "M" ili ti "Min'shara") tada ima i plavo/ plavkasto nebo.
(atmosfera na Vulkanu je nešto rijeđa, ali planet je ipak "M" klase).


Ne znam o čemu pričaš, prve reakcije, kao i recenzije, su iznad svih očekivanja.

Naravno da će biti i negativnih mišljenja, tko zna možda se ni meni film ne svidi pa ga popljujem na SFC-u.